PICO-APL3 vs Core-3399-JD4 AI System on Module
PICO-APL3 is $4 cheaper; PICO-APL3 has more storage (32 GB vs 16 GB); PICO-APL3 has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | PICO-APL3 | Core-3399-JD4 AI System on Module |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="145" data-ccy="USD">$145</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="149" data-ccy="USD">$149</span> |
| CPU | Intel Pentium N4200 | Rockchip RK3399 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Storage | 32 GB SATA | 16 GB |
| Graphics | HDMI 1.4 x 1 | — |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 | — |
| Operating system | Win 10 (64 bit) / Linux Ubuntu 16.04.2/ Kernel 4.8.0-36 | — |
| Ethernet | 1 GbE | — |
| Ports | RJ45 | — |
More single-board computers comparisons
- PICO-APL3 vs ODROID-M1 with 8GB RAM
- Core-3399-JD4 AI System on Module vs LattePanda V1 - The Smallest Windows 10 Single Board Computer with Win10 Home License (2GB/32GB)
- Nanocom-adn vs PICO-APL3
- Core-3399-JD4 AI System on Module vs iCore-3576Q AIOT System on Module RK3576
- PICO-APL3 vs Core-3399J Six-Core 64-Bit System On Module
- AIO-3566JD4 Quad-Core 64-Bit ARM Motherboard vs Core-3399-JD4 AI System on Module