2U GPU Server - Xeon W vs Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server
2U GPU Server - Xeon W is $17,450.01 cheaper; Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server has more RAM (64 GB vs 32 GB); Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server has more storage (1.92 TB vs 256 GB); Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | 2U GPU Server - Xeon W | Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="7258.99" data-ccy="USD">$7,258.99</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="24709" data-ccy="USD">$24,709</span> |
| CPU | Intel Xeon W 3425 | AMD EPYC 9175F |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR5 ECC | 64 GB DDR5 ECC |
| Storage | 256 GB SATA SSD | 1.92 TB NVMe |
| Graphics | — | ASPEED AST2600 |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS |
| Weight | — | 52.9 lb |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
More servers comparisons
- 2U GPU Server - Xeon W vs TWX QS4-14R7
- 4U Rackmount Workstation PC with Dual Intel Xeon 6 Series processors vs Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server
- 2U GPU Server - Xeon W vs 2U BigTwin SuperServer
- Titan S890 - Intel Xeon 600 Series Granite Rapids High Performance AI Rackmount HPC vs Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server
- 2U GPU Server - Xeon W vs AMD Ryzen 9000 Series processors, X870 Chipset, Octane Render 4U Rackmount PC Workstation
- Rax RXE4-1104-01 vs Redshift 2U Rackmount Node Server