UNO-1372G-3S52 vs Mercury v3
Mercury v3 is $1 cheaper; Mercury v3 has more RAM (32 GB vs 4 GB); Mercury v3 has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | UNO-1372G-3S52 | Mercury v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="1800" data-ccy="USD">$1,800</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="1799" data-ccy="USD">$1,799</span> |
| CPU | Intel Celeron J1900 | Intel Core i7 13620H |
| RAM | 4 GB DDR3L | 32 GB DDR5-5600 |
| Storage | — | 1 TB NVMe |
| Graphics | — | NVIDIA RTX 5060 · 8 GB |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | Windows 7 | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS |
| Weight | 2.2 lb | — |
| Ethernet | 1 GbE | — |
| Ports | HDMI · RJ45 | HDMI 2.0 · RJ45 · Audio |
More mini PCs comparisons
- UNO-1372G-3S52 vs TM260 with ThinManager
- HP EliteDesk 8 Mini G1i Desktop AI PC vs Mercury v3
- UNO-1372G-3S52 vs Helix 511
- Mercury v3 vs TM130 with ThinManager
- UNO-1372G-3S52 vs Intel Core Ultra processors (Series 2), Z890 Chipset, Ncore 100 MAX AIO Small Tower Custom Computer
- Mercury v3 vs TM250 with ThinManager

/UNO-1372G-J_front_B20171020145124.png)

