AMD EPYC 4U Rackmount Liquid Cooled Workstation PC vs PowerEdge T160
PowerEdge T160 is $270 cheaper; PowerEdge T160 has more RAM (32 GB vs 16 GB); AMD EPYC 4U Rackmount Liquid Cooled Workstation PC has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | AMD EPYC 4U Rackmount Liquid Cooled Workstation PC | PowerEdge T160 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="4669" data-ccy="USD">$4,669</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="4399" data-ccy="USD">$4,399</span> |
| CPU | AMD EPYC 9015 | Intel Xeon E 2434 |
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5-5600 ECC | 32 GB |
| Storage | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 1 TB HDD SATA III |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX A400 · 4 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | No OS |
More servers comparisons
- AMD EPYC 4U Rackmount Liquid Cooled Workstation PC vs HPE ProLiant DL20 Gen11 6325P 3.5GHz 4c 1P 2x16GB-U 4SFF 2x500W PS NA Server
- PowerEdge T160 vs 1U WIO SuperServer
- 1U Server - 8 x Hot-Swap Bays - Xeon Scalable vs AMD EPYC 4U Rackmount Liquid Cooled Workstation PC
- 2U Server - Xeon Scalable - 3 x Hot-Swap Bays vs PowerEdge T160
- 1U Virtualization Rackmount Server vs AMD EPYC 4U Rackmount Liquid Cooled Workstation PC
- Intel Xeon W Processors, W790 Chipset, 5U Rackmount Workstation PC vs PowerEdge T160