Intel Xeon W Processors, W790 Chipset, Catia Performance PC Workstation vs Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation
Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation is $1,750 cheaper; Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation has more RAM (384 GB vs 16 GB).
| Specification | Intel Xeon W Processors, W790 Chipset, Catia Performance PC Workstation | Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="33099" data-ccy="USD">$33,099</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="31349" data-ccy="USD">$31,349</span> |
| CPU | Intel Xeon W 3575X | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5-6400 ECC | 384 GB DDR5 ECC |
| Storage | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 · 96 GB GDDR7 | ASpeed ADT2600 |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS |
| Weight | — | 36.4 lb |
| Ethernet | — | 10 GbE |
More workstations comparisons
- Intel Xeon W Processors, W790 Chipset, Catia Performance PC Workstation vs Bizon X7500
- AMD Dual EPYC Workstation vs Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation
- Intel Xeon W Processors, W790 Chipset, Catia Performance PC Workstation vs VSX WE95-2T08
- Advanced Aventum Pro (ai) vs Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation
- Intel Xeon W Processors, W790 Chipset, Catia Performance PC Workstation vs Syber AMD Threadripper Workstation Pro AI 03
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7000, WRX90 Chipset, Data Science PC Workstation vs Scientific Computing Dual AMD EPYC Workstation