Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs PowerEdge R7615
Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) is $1,130 cheaper; PowerEdge R7615 has more RAM (64 GB vs 16 GB); PowerEdge R7615 has more storage (2 TB vs 1 TB); Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) | PowerEdge R7615 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="12669" data-ccy="USD">$12,669</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="13799" data-ccy="USD">$13,799</span> |
| CPU | Intel Xeon W 3565X | AMD EPYC 9124 |
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5-5600 ECC | 64 GB |
| Storage | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 2 TB HDD SATA III |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX 5080 · 16 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | No OS |
More servers comparisons
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs Bizon G8000 G2
- PowerEdge R7615 vs 5U GPU SuperServer
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs 2U SuperStorage Server
- PowerEdge R7615 vs ThinkSystem SR675 V3 for AI
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs 2U H13 Hyper SuperServer
- PowerEdge R7615 vs IOT/Embedded System