Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs 2U BigTwin SuperServer
2U BigTwin SuperServer is $1,180.32 cheaper; 2U BigTwin SuperServer has more RAM (4 TB vs 16 GB); Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) | 2U BigTwin SuperServer |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="12669" data-ccy="USD">$12,669</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="11488.68" data-ccy="USD">$11,488.68</span> |
| CPU | Intel Xeon W 3565X | Intel Xeon 6700/6500 Series With P-Cores or 6700 Series with E-Cores |
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5-5600 ECC | 4 TB DDR5 |
| Storage | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | — |
| Drive bays | — | 6 bays |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX 5080 · 16 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | — |
| Ports | — | RJ45 |
More servers comparisons
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs Bizon G8000 G2
- ThinkSystem SR675 V3 for AI vs 2U BigTwin SuperServer
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Minimum Spec)
- 2U BigTwin SuperServer vs 5U GPU SuperServer
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs 2U SuperStorage Server
- 2U BigTwin SuperServer vs 2U H13 Hyper SuperServer