Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs Rax RE95-1112-01
Rax RE95-1112-01 is $1,038.58 cheaper; Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) has more storage (1 TB vs 480 GB); Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) | Rax RE95-1112-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="12669" data-ccy="USD">$12,669</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="11630.42" data-ccy="USD">$11,630.42</span> |
| CPU | Intel Xeon W 3565X | AMD EPYC 9015 |
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5-5600 ECC | 16 GB DDR5-6400 ECC |
| Storage | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 480 GB NVMe PCIe 4.0 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX 5080 · 16 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | No OS |
More servers comparisons
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs Bizon G8000 G2
- 5U GPU SuperServer vs Rax RE95-1112-01
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs 2U SuperStorage Server
- ThinkSystem SR675 V3 for AI vs Rax RE95-1112-01
- Pixotope W790 Rackmount Tracking Server (Optimal Spec) vs 2U H13 Hyper SuperServer
- IOT/Embedded System vs Rax RE95-1112-01

