Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) vs Rax RXS6-1212-01
Rax RXS6-1212-01 is $5,557.58 cheaper; Rax RXS6-1212-01 has more RAM (32 GB vs 16 GB); Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) has more storage (1 TB vs 480 GB); Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) | Rax RXS6-1212-01 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="19989" data-ccy="USD">$19,989</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="14431.42" data-ccy="USD">$14,431.42</span> |
| CPU | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX | Intel Xeon 6505P |
| RAM | 16 GB DDR5-5600 ECC | 32 GB DDR5-6400 ECC |
| Storage | 1 TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 480 GB NVMe PCIe 4.0 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX 5090 · 32 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | No OS |
More servers comparisons
- Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) vs Bizon X7000 G3
- Rax RXS6-1212-01 vs Titan S6700 - Dual Intel Xeon 6 HPC Up To 288 CPU Cores
- Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) vs CSB1-N10NorinNX Jetson Orin NX Server
- PowerEdge R7715 vs Rax RXS6-1212-01
- Pixotope WRX90 Rackmount Graphics Server (Optimal Spec) vs V-Ray 1U Rackmount Node Server
- Advanced Rack Pro (eng) vs Rax RXS6-1212-01