Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) is $15.04 cheaper; Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router has more storage (128 MB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router | hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="39.99" data-ccy="USD">$39.99</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="24.95" data-ccy="USD">$24.95</span> |
| CPU | SF19A28, Dual-Core @1 GHz | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9533 |
| RAM | 128 MB DDR3 | — |
| Storage | 128 MB | 16 MB |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | RouterOS |
| Weight | 0.32 lb | — |
| Ports | 1×USB-C · RJ45 | RJ45 |
| Rating | ★ 4.9 | — |
More routers comparisons
- Mango 2 (GL-MG1300) Dual-band Mini Travel Router vs Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router
- Marble (GL-B3000) Wi-Fi 6 Dual-Band Gigabit Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs Shadow (GL-AR300M16) Wireless Mini Router (Grey)
- hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) vs hAP (RB951Ui-2nD)
- Mango (GL-MT300N-V2) Wireless Mini Router vs Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router
- hAP ax lite (L41G-2axD) vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)