Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs RUTC16
RUTC16 has more RAM (1 GB vs 128 MB); RUTC16 has more storage (8 GB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway | RUTC16 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="118.9" data-ccy="USD">$118.90</span> | — |
| CPU | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9531 | Mediatek, Dual-core |
| RAM | 128 MB DDR2 | 1 GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 16 MB | 8 GB eMMC |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | Linux |
| Weight | — | 1.1 lb |
| Wi-Fi | — | 6 |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
| Ports | 1×USB-C · RJ45 | 1×USB-A · RJ45 |
| Rating | ★ 4.8 | — |
More routers comparisons
- Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs L009UiGS-RM
- Chateau LTE7 (D53G-5HacD2HnD-TC&R11e-LTE7) vs RUTC16
- Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs SXT LTE7 kit (SXTR&R11e-LTE7)
- hAP ac³ (RBD53iG-5HacD2HnD) vs RUTC16
- Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs PowerBox Pro (RB960PGS-PB)
- L009UiGS-2HaxD-IN vs RUTC16