Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs RUTC50
RUTC50 has more RAM (512 MB vs 128 MB); Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway has more storage (16 MB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway | RUTC50 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="118.9" data-ccy="USD">$118.90</span> | — |
| CPU | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9531 | MediaTek Cortex A53 |
| RAM | 128 MB DDR2 | 512 MB DDR3 |
| Storage | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | Linux |
| Weight | — | 1.0 lb |
| Wi-Fi | — | 6 |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
| Ports | 1×USB-C · RJ45 | 1×USB-A · RJ45 |
| Rating | ★ 4.8 | — |
More routers comparisons
- Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs L009UiGS-RM
- Chateau LTE7 (D53G-5HacD2HnD-TC&R11e-LTE7) vs RUTC50
- Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs SXT LTE7 kit (SXTR&R11e-LTE7)
- hAP ac³ (RBD53iG-5HacD2HnD) vs RUTC50
- Puli (GL-XE300) 4G LTE Wireless Security Gateway vs PowerBox Pro (RB960PGS-PB)
- L009UiGS-2HaxD-IN vs RUTC50