ODROID-H2 vs Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900
Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900 has more RAM (36 GB vs 32 GB); Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900 has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | ODROID-H2 | Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="111" data-ccy="USD">$111</span> | — |
| CPU | Intel Celeron J4105 | Qualcomm Cortex A78C |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR4 | 36 GB LPDDR5-6400 ECC |
| Storage | 6 GB | 128 GB eMMC PCIe 4.0 |
| Drive bays | 1× M.2 | — |
| Graphics | — | Adreno 663 GPU, Delivers 1.2 TFLOPS FP32 with secure GPU compute, Supports Vulkan 1.2, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Supports Adreno NN Direct |
| NPU | — | 200 TOPS |
| Display | 4K | — |
| Operating system | — | Ubuntu |
| Wi-Fi | — | 6 |
| Ethernet | 1 GbE | 2.5 GbE |
| Ports | HDMI 2.0 · DP 1.2 · RJ45 | HDMI 2.0 · RJ45 |
More single-board computers comparisons
- Core-3328-JD4 Quad-core 64-bit System on Module vs ODROID-H2
- Core-PX30-JD4 Quad-core 64-bit System on Module vs Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900
- Core-3128J Quad-Core System on Module vs ODROID-H2
- ROC-RK3506B-CC ARM Single Board Computer vs Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900
- EMB-H110B vs ODROID-H2
- VIM1S vs Radxa Fogwise AIRbox Q900