hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) vs RUT202
RUT202 has more storage (32 MB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) | RUT202 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="24.95" data-ccy="USD">$24.95</span> | — |
| CPU | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9533 | MediaTek MIPS 24KEc |
| RAM | — | 128 MB DDR2 |
| Storage | 16 MB | 32 MB |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | RouterOS | Linux |
| Weight | — | 0.29 lb |
| Wi-Fi | — | 4 |
| Ethernet | — | 100 MbE |
| Ports | RJ45 | RJ45 |
More routers comparisons
- Mango (GL-MT300N-V2) Wireless Mini Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- Shadow (GL-AR300M16) Wireless Mini Router (Grey) vs RUT202
- Mango 2 (GL-MG1300) Dual-band Mini Travel Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs RUT202
- Marble (GL-B3000) Wi-Fi 6 Dual-Band Gigabit Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- hAP (RB951Ui-2nD) vs RUT202