2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender vs GPX QH10-25E9-10GPU
GPX QH10-25E9-10GPU is $46,469.63 cheaper; 2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender has more RAM (64 GB vs 32 GB); 2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender has more storage (5.8 TB vs 240 GB).
| Specification | 2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender | GPX QH10-25E9-10GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="106347.63" data-ccy="USD">$106,347.63</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="59878" data-ccy="USD">$59,878</span> |
| CPU | AMD EPYC 9275F | AMD EPYC 9015 |
| RAM | 64 GB DDR5 | 32 GB DDR5-6400 ECC |
| Storage | 5.8 TB NVMe PCIe 5.0 | 240 GB SATA SSD |
| Graphics | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 · 96 GB | NVIDIA L40S · 48 GB GDDR6 |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS | No OS |
More servers comparisons
- 2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender vs 5U Gold Series GPU Server
- Liquid Cooled GPU Super AI Station vs GPX QH10-25E9-10GPU
- 2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender vs Gold Series GPU Super AI Station
- Ultimate GPU Server (ai) vs GPX QH10-25E9-10GPU
- ThinkEdge SE455i V3 vs 2U Rackmount Node for OctaneRender
- 4U Gold Series GPU SuperServer vs GPX QH10-25E9-10GPU