FS6400 vs Network Video Recorder
FS6400 has more RAM (32 GB vs 4 GB).
| Specification | FS6400 | Network Video Recorder |
|---|---|---|
| Price | — | <span class="mtag" data-amt="299" data-ccy="USD">$299</span> |
| CPU | Intel Xeon Silver 4110 | Arm Cortex A57 |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR4 ECC | 4 GB |
| Storage | — | — |
| Drive bays | 24 bays | — |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | — |
| Weight | — | 11.3 lb |
| Ethernet | 10 GbE | 10 GbE |
| Ports | — | RJ45 |
More NAS comparisons
- CWWK 6-bay 10G NAS N100/N150/Dual X550 2.5G Dual 10G Ethernet Ports + 10G/6*SATA3.0/Single DDR5 + 3*NVMe NAS Motherboard vs FS6400
- F4-212 vs Network Video Recorder
- Aoostar R7 5825U 2-Bay NAS Mini PC vs FS6400
- Morefine Intel Twin Lake N150 4-bay Home NAS Mini PC - M10S vs Network Video Recorder
- ChangWang CWWK X86-P6 Pocket NAS Board PC Intel i3-N355 N150 2xi226-V 2.5G DDR5 4800MHz 4xM.2 NVMe Firewall Router Mini PC Case 2xUSB3.2… vs FS6400
- Network Video Recorder vs Ugreen NASync DXP2800 (Refurbished)