GPX QH8-12E4-8GPU vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server is $8,021.98 cheaper; OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has more RAM (64 GB vs 32 GB); OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has more storage (1.92 TB vs 240 GB).
| Specification | GPX QH8-12E4-8GPU | OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="31200.98" data-ccy="USD">$31,200.98</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="23179" data-ccy="USD">$23,179</span> |
| CPU | AMD EPYC 9124 | AMD EPYC 9175F |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR5-6400 ECC | 64 GB DDR5 ECC |
| Storage | 240 GB SATA SSD | 1.92 TB NVMe |
| Graphics | NVIDIA L40S · 48 GB GDDR6 | ASPEED AST2600 |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | No OS | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS |
| Weight | — | 52.9 lb |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
More servers comparisons
- Intel W790 CPU+GPU Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation PC vs GPX QH8-12E4-8GPU
- AMD TRX50 CPU+GPU Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation PC vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
- 8U GPU SuperServer vs GPX QH8-12E4-8GPU
- AMD WRX90 CPU+GPU Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation PC vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
- 8U GPU SuperServer vs GPX QH8-12E4-8GPU
- PowerEdge R6725 vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server