HDX QN8-52E4 vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server is $30,178.78 cheaper; OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has more RAM (64 GB vs 32 GB); OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has more storage (1.92 TB vs 480 GB); OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | HDX QN8-52E4 | OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="53357.78" data-ccy="USD">$53,357.78</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="23179" data-ccy="USD">$23,179</span> |
| CPU | AMD EPYC 9015 | AMD EPYC 9175F |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR5-6400 ECC | 64 GB DDR5 ECC |
| Storage | 480 GB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 1.92 TB NVMe |
| Graphics | — | ASPEED AST2600 |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | No OS | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS |
| Weight | — | 52.9 lb |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
More servers comparisons
- 2U Gold Series CloudDC A+ Server vs HDX QN8-52E4
- 2U Gold Series A+ Server vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
- CSR2-N72R3588S Cluster Server R2 vs HDX QN8-52E4
- AMD WRX90, 4x RTX 5090 Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
- Enhanced GPU Server (ai) vs HDX QN8-52E4
- AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7000, WRX90 Chipset, V-Ray 4U Rackmount PC Workstation vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server