Rax QH12-11E9 vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server is $9,918.42 cheaper; OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has more RAM (64 GB vs 32 GB); OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has more storage (1.92 TB vs 480 GB); OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server has a dedicated GPU.
| Specification | Rax QH12-11E9 | OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="33097.42" data-ccy="USD">$33,097.42</span> | <span class="mtag" data-amt="23179" data-ccy="USD">$23,179</span> |
| CPU | AMD EPYC 9015 | AMD EPYC 9175F |
| RAM | 32 GB DDR5-6400 ECC | 64 GB DDR5 ECC |
| Storage | 480 GB NVMe PCIe 4.0 | 1.92 TB NVMe |
| Graphics | — | ASPEED AST2600 |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | No OS | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS |
| Weight | — | 52.9 lb |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
More servers comparisons
- 8U GPU SuperServer vs Rax QH12-11E9
- 8U GPU SuperServer vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
- Intel W790 CPU+GPU Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation PC vs Rax QH12-11E9
- ThinkSystem SR675i V3 vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server
- AMD TRX50 CPU+GPU Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation PC vs Rax QH12-11E9
- AMD WRX90 CPU+GPU Liquid Cooled Rackmount Workstation PC vs OctaneRender 2U Rackmount Node Server