Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs RUTM50 Japan
RUTM50 Japan has more RAM (256 MB vs 128 MB); Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router has more storage (128 MB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router | RUTM50 Japan |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="39.99" data-ccy="USD">$39.99</span> | — |
| CPU | SF19A28, Dual-Core @1 GHz | MediaTek MIPS 1004Kc |
| RAM | 128 MB DDR3 | 256 MB DDR3 |
| Storage | 128 MB | 16 MB |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | Linux |
| Weight | 0.32 lb | 1.1 lb |
| Wi-Fi | — | 5 |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
| Ports | 1×USB-C · RJ45 | 1×USB-A · RJ45 |
| Rating | ★ 4.9 | — |
More routers comparisons
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs hEX lite (RB750r2)
- hAP (RB951Ui-2nD) vs RUTM50 Japan
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- hAP lite (RB941-2nD) vs RUTM50 Japan
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs hAP ax lite (L41G-2axD)
- hAP ac lite (RB952Ui-5ac2nD) vs RUTM50 Japan