hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) vs RUTC72
RUTC72 has more storage (8 GB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC) | RUTC72 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="24.95" data-ccy="USD">$24.95</span> | — |
| CPU | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9533 | MediaTek Cortex A53 |
| RAM | — | 1 GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 16 MB | 8 GB eMMC |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | RouterOS | Linux |
| Weight | — | 1.0 lb |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
| Ports | RJ45 | 1×USB-A · RJ45 |
More routers comparisons
- Mango (GL-MT300N-V2) Wireless Mini Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- Shadow (GL-AR300M16) Wireless Mini Router (Grey) vs RUTC72
- Mango 2 (GL-MG1300) Dual-band Mini Travel Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs RUTC72
- Marble (GL-B3000) Wi-Fi 6 Dual-Band Gigabit Router vs hAP lite TC (RB941-2nD-TC)
- hAP (RB951Ui-2nD) vs RUTC72