hAP (RB951Ui-2nD) vs RUTC40
RUTC40 has more storage (8 GB vs 16 MB).
| Specification | hAP (RB951Ui-2nD) | RUTC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="45" data-ccy="USD">$45</span> | — |
| CPU | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9531 | MediaTek Cortex A53 |
| RAM | — | 1 GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 16 MB | 8 GB eMMC |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | RouterOS | Linux |
| Weight | — | 1.1 lb |
| Wi-Fi | — | 6 |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
| Ports | RJ45 | 1×USB-A · RJ45 |
More routers comparisons
- Marble (GL-B3000) Wi-Fi 6 Dual-Band Gigabit Router vs hAP (RB951Ui-2nD)
- Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs RUTC40
- Mango 2 (GL-MG1300) Dual-band Mini Travel Router vs hAP (RB951Ui-2nD)
- Netgear 4-Stream Dual-Band WiFi 6 Router, 1.6Gbps (RAX5) vs RUTC40
- Mango (GL-MT300N-V2) Wireless Mini Router vs hAP (RB951Ui-2nD)
- hEX lite (RB750r2) vs RUTC40