Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router vs RUTC40
RUTC40 has more RAM (1 GB vs 128 MB); RUTC40 has more storage (8 GB vs 128 MB).
| Specification | Opal (GL-SFT1200) Wireless Travel Router | RUTC40 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | <span class="mtag" data-amt="39.99" data-ccy="USD">$39.99</span> | — |
| CPU | SF19A28, Dual-Core @1 GHz | MediaTek Cortex A53 |
| RAM | 128 MB DDR3 | 1 GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 128 MB | 8 GB eMMC |
| Graphics | — | — |
| Display | — | — |
| Operating system | — | Linux |
| Weight | 0.32 lb | 1.1 lb |
| Wi-Fi | — | 6 |
| Ethernet | — | 1 GbE |
| Ports | 1×USB-C · RJ45 | 1×USB-A · RJ45 |
| Rating | ★ 4.9 | — |